The Conveniences I Used to Write a Book About Inconvenience (Definitely Not AI)
After a few months, I got used to the sarcasm. If I told a friend I was writing a book called Against Convenience, they’d ask whether I was planning to write it by hand, whether I’d use spell-check, or if.
The article introduces a book titled Against Convenience, which explores the idea of rejecting modern conveniences in favor of more deliberate or challenging alternatives. The title plays on the word convenience, which refers to tools, technologies, or practices that make tasks easier or save time. For example, spell-check is a convenience that automatically corrects spelling errors, while handwriting is a slower, less automated method. The author uses sarcasm to highlight how writing a book about rejecting convenience might itself rely on conveniences, such as digital tools or automated processes. The tone suggests a playful critique of modern efficiency culture, where even acts of rebellion can become entangled in the systems they aim to challenge.
The author describes adopting a sarcastic tone when discussing the book project with others. Sarcasm is a form of humor that uses irony to mock or criticize, often by saying the opposite of what is meant. In this context, the author’s sarcasm likely serves to highlight the irony of writing a book about rejecting convenience while potentially relying on conveniences like digital writing tools or automated editing software. The tone reflects a self-aware approach to the topic, acknowledging that even the act of writing the book may involve some level of convenience, despite its central theme.
