5 Book Reviews You Need to Read This Week
Our five-alarm fire of fabulous reviews this week includes Andrew Martin on Patrick deWitt’s Dodge City, Zito Madu on Chuck Klosterman’s Football, A.O. Scott on Ayad Akhtar’s The Radiance, Emma Hager on Devyn Defoe’s Burnside, and Melissa Harrison on Rebecca Perry’s May We Feed the.
This article highlights five recent book reviews published in October 2026, covering a range of genres and themes. The reviews discuss works by Patrick deWitt, Chuck Klosterman, Ayad Akhtar, Devyn Defoe, and Rebecca Perry. Each review is written by a different critic and published in notable outlets like The New York Times Book Review, The Nation, and The Baffler. The article aims to guide readers toward noteworthy literary works, emphasizing the diversity of contemporary fiction and nonfiction. The reviews explore topics such as historical fiction, sports culture, campus life, regional identity, and surreal allegory, reflecting the breadth of modern literary discourse.
Andrew Martin reviews Patrick deWitt’s novel Dodge City, published in 2026, which follows a character named Lee as he visits family members across the U.S. in 1967. The novel blends elements of realism, historical fiction, and satire, showcasing deWitt’s versatility in genre. Critics often describe deWitt’s work as picaresque, meaning it features a protagonist who moves through a series of loosely connected adventures or encounters. His dialogue is noted for its distinctive, slightly formal tone, which appears in all his novels. The story explores themes of family, crisis, and moral conflict, particularly as Lee grapples with the Vietnam War draft. The review highlights deWitt’s ability to juxtapose seemingly unrelated events to create deeper meaning, a technique that defines his narrative style.
Zito Madu reviews Chuck Klosterman’s book Football, which argues that American football, despite its popularity, is a fragile institution destined to decline. Klosterman presents this idea as a thought experiment, imagining future historians studying the sport after its collapse. The review critiques Klosterman’s approach, noting that while he defends football’s virtues, he also presents it as an abstract ideal rather than a lived reality. The book touches on themes like the sport’s structural racism, its ties to militarism, and the NFL’s economic model, which Madu describes as a form of American socialism—a term Klosterman uses to describe the league’s revenue-sharing system. The review questions whether Klosterman genuinely believes his own thesis or if he is performing a public obituary, a term referring to a sanitized retrospective that glosses over flaws.
A.O. Scott reviews Ayad Akhtar’s novel The Radiance, a genre-blending work that resists easy categorization. The book combines elements of campus comedy, medical mystery, and spiritual quest, among others. Akhtar, known for his Pulitzer-winning play Disgraced and the novel Homeland Elegies, skewers both Islamophobic intolerance and liberal multiculturalist piety. The story follows Ayad, a narrator who struggles to articulate his experiences in a politically charged academic environment. Scott praises Akhtar’s ability to dismantle cultural certainties, describing the novel as a psyop—short for psychological operation—a term borrowed from military strategy to describe a covert mission to influence perceptions. The review emphasizes Akhtar’s skill in navigating complex social dynamics while maintaining narrative tension.
Emma Hager reviews Devyn Defoe’s novel Burnside, a surreal allegory set in a fictionalized version of California’s Central Valley. The story explores themes of liberal NIMBYism (Not In My Backyard), ecological disaster, and regional identity through a dystopian lens. Defoe’s characters navigate a hyperreal environment where violence, arson, and societal decay are pervasive. The novel references real-world California phenomena, such as the Golden State Killer and the Donner Party, to evoke a sense of historical and cultural unease. Hager critiques the book’s reliance on irony and its inability to reconcile its satirical tone with substantive social commentary. The review describes Burnside as a proper California novel, a genre that often grapples with the state’s contradictions and disillusionments.
Melissa Harrison reviews Rebecca Perry’s debut novel *May We Feed the King*, a highly stylized and puzzle-like work set in a medieval palace. The story follows an unnamed king who resists his role as a ruler, while a curator arranges the palace for public display after a personal tragedy. Perry’s background in poetry is evident in the novel’s fragmented, *highly wrought* structure, which deliberately disorients the reader. The review compares the narrative perspective to glimpses seen from odd angles, as if the reader is a ghost observing scenes from afar. The novel explores themes of power, objecthood, and rebellion, with the king’s struggle symbolizing the burden of authority. Harrison notes that the book rewards curiosity but subverts traditional storytelling expectations, making it a challenging yet intriguing read.

